我們把地球當敵人,9 項居住指標已超標 4 項

頭像
鄧登凳
夸克星
文章: 9493
註冊時間: 週一 03 8月, 2009 17:15
來自: 3rd planet of solar system

文章 鄧登凳 » 週六 28 3月, 2015 18:30

One cannot judge whether it is sandstorm or smog by visual inspection.

The harmful effects of the two to health are quite different. Sandstorm consists of larger particles (usually bigger than 10 micron), which can be easily filtered out.

In smog the harmful effect comes from ozone and PM2.5 (particles of size less than 2.5 micron) which cannot be handled by filtration.

PM2.5 comes mainly from industry and ozone cannot be produced by sandstorm.

Read this, it is mainland website: http://www.ecns.cn/cns-wire/2014/05-22/115420.shtml

bbsdma
原恆星
文章: 60
註冊時間: 週一 19 1月, 2009 19:56

文章 bbsdma » 週一 30 3月, 2015 06:28

Chanlunlun 寫:
lightning 寫:!點解又改咗完全相反嘅意思? :roll:

人類活動破壞環境連4歲小朋友都知,點會唔岩?
Yes we may be destroying our environment but no in such a degree that we will soon kill our planet. Earth is still in good shape. It;s a pity that mass media always exaggerates in order to attract eyeballs.

Take Peking for example, the so called "smog" may not all entirely originate from air pollution. Actually quite a part of "smog" comes from water vapor in air and tiny sand particles blowing in from northern deserts. They are part of the nature.

Of course pollution plays a part, but not as a terrible part as some movie/media said.
Dear Chan Sir,
From the discussion below:
http://aqicn.org/faq/2015-02-08/visual- ... -to-hanoi/
(Hanoi user suspects the AQI number in Hanoi much better than that of Beijing, given similar visibility reduction observed.) I think it is safe for us to say, at least in Hanoi, the water droplets are EXCLUDED from PM calculation.
I personally don't see any technical troubles to do so, dozens of methods can. One of the simplest I was wondering is just heat the air sample a few degrees above dew point can evaporate the water droplets into water vapor, which is gas itself, should not be detected as micro-meter size particles by any PM measuring means.

頭像
WFPC2
夸克星
文章: 2846
註冊時間: 週三 04 7月, 2007 08:21
來自: Andromeda Galaxy

文章 WFPC2 » 週一 30 3月, 2015 08:32

No matter whether the air pollution problem is caused by smog or dust particles.Air pollution is still a problem in many other urban areas around the world besides the Mainland China.Although I 'm not always fully accept to what the mass media say but at least I definitely don't believe to somebody say air pollution is not a problem especially in the Mainland China 's urban cities. It is obviously opposite to the real situation as the links you share are point out to the air pollution problem in urban cities.

To sum up. Air pollution is really a problem in the Mainland
China as everybody known and it is caused by human activities
at a certain degree.

頭像
WFPC2
夸克星
文章: 2846
註冊時間: 週三 04 7月, 2007 08:21
來自: Andromeda Galaxy

文章 WFPC2 » 週二 31 3月, 2015 08:11

鄧登凳 寫:One cannot judge whether it is sandstorm or smog by visual inspection.

: htl
The news we heard from TV and official meteorological reports is not just based on visual inspection but from the precise data they
have collected.
bbsdma 寫: Dear Chan Sir,
From the discussion below:
http://aqicn.org/faq/2015-02-08/visual- ... -to-hanoi/
(Hanoi user suspects the AQI number in Hanoi much better than that of Beijing, given similar visibility reduction observed.) I think it is safe for us to say, at least in Hanoi, the water droplets are EXCLUDED from PM calculation.
I personally don't see any technical troubles to do so, dozens of methods can. One of the simplest I was wondering is just heat the air sample a few degrees above dew point can evaporate the water droplets into water vapor, which is gas itself, should not be detected as micro-meter size particles by any PM measuring means.


Sorry!I can't help to give some comments again.

The information you give seems to be no relationship to what the main topic talking about and it can not reflect anything from real.

頭像
扒飯撈麵
夸克星
文章: 2960
註冊時間: 週日 06 7月, 2003 00:12
來自: 太空

文章 扒飯撈麵 » 週二 31 3月, 2015 08:40

Try to explain APEC blue

lightning
原恆星
文章: 100
註冊時間: 週日 27 4月, 2008 22:12

文章 lightning » 週二 31 3月, 2015 09:14

唉!我唔識D咩APEC Blue,但係睇到呢個討論過程,只是起初嘅立論錯咗,
之後解釋乜嘢都係冇意思的。

始終說服唔到人話空氣污染不是一個問題吧。 :? :?

明明見到街有炸彈,偏偏話佢唔係炸彈,咁無稽
到炸彈爆喺上嚟咪大件事,我地都唔會咁樣嘩眾取寵
,傳受d咁嘅概念俾年輕人吧!講笑都揾第二樣呀!
:?

回覆文章

回到「天文話題 Everything about Astronomy」

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 2 位訪客