My Deepsky photos on 2004/10/18 at Pak Tam Chung (Final vers
My Deepsky photos on 2004/10/18 at Pak Tam Chung (Final vers
Image taken on 2004/10/18 night at Pak Tam Chung
Telescope : Celestron c80wa refractor
Mount : Modified Zhitong EQ4
Guiding : C5 guidescope + DIY Autoguider with software Startrack
Camera / Film : Nikon FM2 / Fuji Press 800
Exposure : 20 mins + 5 mins
M42 Please comment.
- 附加檔案
-
- M42 full frame
- 008 and 009 stacked resized.jpg (50.44 KiB) 已瀏覽 8853 次
-
- M42 crop
- 008 and 009 crop.jpg (164.47 KiB) 已瀏覽 8855 次
Images taken on 2004/10/18 night at Pak Tam Chung
Telescope : Celestron c80wa refractor
Mount : Modified Zhitong EQ4
Guiding : C5 guidescope + DIY Autoguider with software Startrack
Camera / Film : Nikon FM2 / Fuji Press 800
Exposure : 3 x 15 ~ 20 mins
M45 Please comment.
- 附加檔案
-
- M45 full frame
- 004 005 006 stacked resized full frame.JPG (9.18 KiB) 已瀏覽 8847 次
-
- M45 crop
- 004 005 006 crop a.JPG (27.13 KiB) 已瀏覽 8848 次
Very subtle Horsehead and Flame nebula taken on 2004/10/18 at Pak Tam Chung
Almost couldn't see lar.
Image taken on 2004/10/18 night at Pak Tam Chung
Telescope : Celestron c80wa refractor
Mount : Modified Zhitong EQ4
Guiding : C5 guidescope + DIY Autoguider with software Startrack
Camera / Film : Nikon FM2 / Fuji Press 800
Exposure : 40 mins
Almost couldn't see lar.
Image taken on 2004/10/18 night at Pak Tam Chung
Telescope : Celestron c80wa refractor
Mount : Modified Zhitong EQ4
Guiding : C5 guidescope + DIY Autoguider with software Startrack
Camera / Film : Nikon FM2 / Fuji Press 800
Exposure : 40 mins
- 附加檔案
-
- 010 resized.jpg (113.6 KiB) 已瀏覽 8843 次
Thanks for the comments.
I think c80wa is really a low cost beginner scope not only for visual but also for astrophotography. I was inspired by a person in Chile who used this scope and produced bunge of great photos! Initially I bought that for guidescope of C5, but I think i will use that more.
For the modification of the Zhitong EQ4 mount, I changed the stop so it can work okay in HK's attitude, and I also reduced the radial play (clearance) of the Alt. axis of the mount so it is more stable, and also making it with autoguide capability.
I think c80wa is really a low cost beginner scope not only for visual but also for astrophotography. I was inspired by a person in Chile who used this scope and produced bunge of great photos! Initially I bought that for guidescope of C5, but I think i will use that more.
For the modification of the Zhitong EQ4 mount, I changed the stop so it can work okay in HK's attitude, and I also reduced the radial play (clearance) of the Alt. axis of the mount so it is more stable, and also making it with autoguide capability.
Is him?elton 寫:I was inspired by a person in Chile who used this scope and produced bunge of great photos!
http://astrosurf.com/victor
Re: My Deepsky photos on 2004/10/18 at Pak Tam Chung (Final
Good start. I would like to recommend you to try the C5 with 0.63x prime focus next time. It should give less CA than your refractor.elton 寫:
Image taken on 2004/10/18 night at Pak Tam Chung
Telescope : Celestron c80wa refractor
Mount : Modified Zhitong EQ4
Guiding : C5 guidescope + DIY Autoguider with software Startrack
Camera / Film : Nikon FM2 / Fuji Press 800
Exposure : 20 mins + 5 mins
M42 Please comment.
Thanks Subaru!!! I will try my little gem C5 + 0.63 x reducer next time. The reason why i used 80 mm was because it has a smaller f-number, which let me do shorter exposure (higher possibility of success as I am a real beginner. )
By the way, I do not know much about the 0.63 reducer even I got one. I only know that it could reduce the exposure time by half and obtained a virtually wider view (actually I was told it is just smaller in size and the 'wider view' are just vignetting black corners). I want to know increasing or decreasing the distance between the reducer and film will cause what effect? I have seen some accessories from Steve Mogg (who sells Toucam adapters), I previously bought the 0.66x reducer and one 0.3 x extender intended for Toucam long exposure. The 0.66x reducer looks just like our Meade/Celestron 0.63 reducer, but only smaller in size, for the extender, it is just a tube to increase the distance between the Toucam CCD and reducer. Will the f-number of my existing C5 and 0.63 x reducer further decrease if I insert a tube between them???
Please help. Thanks in advance.
By the way, I do not know much about the 0.63 reducer even I got one. I only know that it could reduce the exposure time by half and obtained a virtually wider view (actually I was told it is just smaller in size and the 'wider view' are just vignetting black corners). I want to know increasing or decreasing the distance between the reducer and film will cause what effect? I have seen some accessories from Steve Mogg (who sells Toucam adapters), I previously bought the 0.66x reducer and one 0.3 x extender intended for Toucam long exposure. The 0.66x reducer looks just like our Meade/Celestron 0.63 reducer, but only smaller in size, for the extender, it is just a tube to increase the distance between the Toucam CCD and reducer. Will the f-number of my existing C5 and 0.63 x reducer further decrease if I insert a tube between them???
Please help. Thanks in advance.
1. You must try it as you definitely won't be satisfied with a 3" refractor.elton 寫:1. I will try my little gem C5 + 0.63 x reducer next time. The reason why i used 80 mm was because it has a smaller f-number, which let me do shorter exposure (higher possibility of success as I am a real beginner. )
2. By the way, I do not know much about the 0.63 reducer even I got one. I only know that it could reduce the exposure time by half and obtained a virtually wider view (actually I was told it is just smaller in size and the 'wider view' are just vignetting black corners).
3. I want to know increasing or decreasing the distance between the reducer and film will cause what effect? I have seen some accessories from Steve Mogg (who sells Toucam adapters), I previously bought the 0.66x reducer and one 0.3 x extender intended for Toucam long exposure. The 0.66x reducer looks just like our Meade/Celestron 0.63 reducer, but only smaller in size, for the extender, it is just a tube to increase the distance between the Toucam CCD and reducer. Will the f-number of my existing C5 and 0.63 x reducer further decrease if I insert a tube between them???
Please help. Thanks in advance.
2. The main benefit of the 0.63x reducer is the shortening of the exposure time. The fully illuminated field is just about the same as at f/10, so field of view should not be a main reason to go for the reducer. By the way, field curvature becomes more severe with the reducer.
3. Yes, increase the distance between the reducer and focal plane will decrease the effective focal ratio of the setup. However, you can't go too far due to the abberrations it introduces.
誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 69 位訪客