2 Widefield photos taken in Shui Hau at 2005/1/1
Camera/Lense : Nikon FM2 + 28 mm at f/2.8
Exposure : E200, 3 ~ 4 mins. Each stacked with 3 frames. Scan with Nikon Coolscan IV.
Mount : Orion EQ1 with RA on, unguided
First time trying the E200 for widefield astrophotography, seems many red nebulas accidentally taken lar!
Interesting about E200 is... Its ability to capture red nebula is even fast than the faster film Press800! And the grains are much much finer! I love E200!!!
2 Widefield photos taken in Shui Hau at 2005/1/1
2 Widefield photos taken in Shui Hau at 2005/1/1
最後由 elton 於 週五 18 3月, 2005 21:55 編輯,總共編輯了 1 次。
- KingArthur
- 夸克星
- 文章: 2398
- 註冊時間: 週四 14 8月, 2003 17:50
- 來自: Lantau
-
- 中子星
- 文章: 1707
- 註冊時間: 週日 02 1月, 2005 20:41
- 來自: hk
Thanks a lot for the comments.
I found that widefield is easy and at the same time difficult. Easy for much more simple equipment (not need to have those heavy guidemount/scope, autoguider when comparing to deepsky astrophotography), and difficult for higher requirement of night sky, composition (including trees, mountain, background), feel (subjective, but yes! )
Besides, widefield photo is so so unique, unlike planetary or DSO, you won't find a similar photo.
I like widefield!
PS - date corrected. It should be on 2005/1/1 which 3 dobs in Shui Hau, and we had 'tsunami clouds' at that night.
I found that widefield is easy and at the same time difficult. Easy for much more simple equipment (not need to have those heavy guidemount/scope, autoguider when comparing to deepsky astrophotography), and difficult for higher requirement of night sky, composition (including trees, mountain, background), feel (subjective, but yes! )
Besides, widefield photo is so so unique, unlike planetary or DSO, you won't find a similar photo.
I like widefield!
PS - date corrected. It should be on 2005/1/1 which 3 dobs in Shui Hau, and we had 'tsunami clouds' at that night.
誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 22 位訪客