FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope

Celestron Meade Vixen Takahashi Astrophysics
Sbig CCD ToUcam Coronado Filter Nikon Canon
<br> 目鏡 ED折射鏡 反射鏡 折反射鏡 太陽望遠鏡 鑢鏡 相機 鏡頭
回覆文章
syyuen168
夸克星
文章: 3856
註冊時間: 週五 06 7月, 2007 23:06

FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope

文章 syyuen168 » 週一 01 2月, 2010 23:43

Somebody from this forum asked in Cloudy nights about the comments on FSQ 106. Looks like a very positive feedback to classify FSQ 106 as a class 1 scope :D :)

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... ll/fpart/1

頭像
willis
中子星
文章: 1796
註冊時間: 週六 14 2月, 2009 08:07
來自: Hong Kong
聯繫:

Re: FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope

文章 willis » 週一 01 2月, 2010 23:52

syyuen168 寫:Somebody from this forum asked in Cloudy nights about the comments on FSQ 106. Looks like a very positive feedback to classify FSQ 106 as a class 1 scope :D :)

http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... ll/fpart/1
Yes! That's me! It seems that for wide field imaging, everyone hat off to FSQ. However, as I mentioned in the post, I need a general purpose scope, for both visual & imaging. I trsut my eyes and I tried APM 80/480 & APM 80/600. There are really outrageous. The best 80mm scope I have ever seen. That's why APM is on my list. I am waiting for a chance to have a look at FSQ.
Willis

Chanlunlun
夸克星
文章: 3843
註冊時間: 週四 09 10月, 2003 21:06

Re: FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope

文章 Chanlunlun » 週二 02 2月, 2010 04:37

syyuen168 寫:Somebody from this forum asked in Cloudy nights about the comments on FSQ 106. Looks like a very positive feedback to classify FSQ 106 as a class 1 scope :D :)
Dear Mr. Yuen,

Sorry to disappoint you- FSQ106 is NOT class 1. I saw it's planetary - not that bad, but obviously not good enough to outperform a much cheaper Vixen.

Although a superb astrograph it has too great high order spherical aberration to be rated as class 1.

This is not a big issue - nobody use FSQ106 to view the planet or lunar.

Best regards
Chan Yuk Lun

回覆文章

回到「廠製儀器 Factory Equipment」

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 12 位訪客