Somebody from this forum asked in Cloudy nights about the comments on FSQ 106. Looks like a very positive feedback to classify FSQ 106 as a class 1 scope
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... ll/fpart/1
FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope
Re: FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope
Yes! That's me! It seems that for wide field imaging, everyone hat off to FSQ. However, as I mentioned in the post, I need a general purpose scope, for both visual & imaging. I trsut my eyes and I tried APM 80/480 & APM 80/600. There are really outrageous. The best 80mm scope I have ever seen. That's why APM is on my list. I am waiting for a chance to have a look at FSQ.syyuen168 寫:Somebody from this forum asked in Cloudy nights about the comments on FSQ 106. Looks like a very positive feedback to classify FSQ 106 as a class 1 scope
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/ ... ll/fpart/1
Willis
-
- 夸克星
- 文章: 3847
- 註冊時間: 週四 09 10月, 2003 21:06
Re: FSQ 106 Class 1 Scope
Dear Mr. Yuen,syyuen168 寫:Somebody from this forum asked in Cloudy nights about the comments on FSQ 106. Looks like a very positive feedback to classify FSQ 106 as a class 1 scope
Sorry to disappoint you- FSQ106 is NOT class 1. I saw it's planetary - not that bad, but obviously not good enough to outperform a much cheaper Vixen.
Although a superb astrograph it has too great high order spherical aberration to be rated as class 1.
This is not a big issue - nobody use FSQ106 to view the planet or lunar.
Best regards
Chan Yuk Lun
誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 2 位訪客